Why Paystack’s Aquisition Should Be A Policy Turning Point In Nigeria
- TECH DIGEST – In what many are tagging the deal of the decade, Stripe has acquired Nigerian payments company, Paystack in a deal worth over $200 million (₦76 billion). This acquisition came against the backdrop of social activism against police brutality in the country.
In many ways, the acquisition has been touted as a validation of the work being done by talented Nigerian youth who often fall victim to the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS).
The problem with law enforcement is somewhat symptomatic of the country’s regulatory landscape which is characterised by corruption and stifling policies that have sometimes brought thriving subsectors to a halt.
Perhaps, the ban on commercial motorcycles (Okada) in January 2020 that put an end to the thriving bike-haling industry in Africa’s most populous city, Lagos, is the most compelling example.
Referencing Nigeria’s regulatory landscape, a report by TechCrunch stated that the US payments giant, Stripe, seems to be taking a big bet on a market that could pose a different kind of risk exposure.
While innovation has always outpaced regulations in most parts of the world, the regulations that affect startups in Nigeria have been puzzling.
2020 has been a year when policymakers have juxtaposed several regulations that are sometimes positive, negative, or completely bewildering.
In January, the President signed the Finance Act into law, granting tax-exempt status for small businesses with turnovers less than ₦25 million a year. The Act also increased VAT on all transactions from 5% to 7.5%.
That was also the month when the Lagos State Government placed a ban on commercial bikes. The following month, it proposed new regulations for ride-hailing services like Uber and Bolt, which came into effect in September 2020.
Read Also:
The federal government proposed steep licence fees and tight government revenue control for the logistics sector, and an amendment to the country’s broadcast code sought to bring an end to content exclusivity in Nigeria; a move that was partly responsible for iROKOtv’s decision to exit the Nigerian market.
From 2018, fintech companies began to witness major regulatory moves. With Paystack, Flutterwave, PiggyVest, and Cowrywise taking the financial sector by storm, the Nigerian Central Bank came up with new exposure drafts that required these companies to pay more to obtain operating licences.
Then Paystack had just raised an impressive $8 million (₦2.9 billion at the time), but the $13.8 million (₦5 billion) capital requirements proposed by the CBN meant that they only had an extra ₦2.1 billion.
Thankfully, the apex bank has not yet enforced the provisions of the draft, but that could change anytime soon.
The focus on payments means there’s no dedicated digital banking licence for startups looking to serve other subsectors. Consequently, some of them make use of Microfinance Banks (MfBs) licences.
However, in 2018, the CBN also sought to increase the minimum capital requirements from ₦20 million ($54,291) to ₦200 million ($542,910); in April 2020, the new guidelines came into effect.
Although fintech companies have historically raised the most funds among Nigerian startups, these figures are steep even for some of the biggest of them.
Why the Paystack deal should be a regulatory turning point?
In a 2016 interview with Techpoint Africa, Paystack CEO, Shola Akinlade, revealed that there was no significant difference between mobile and web services available in the US and Nigeria, but the company was able to leverage the enabling environment in the former.
As stated in our article last week about how the Paystack deal could be a major turning point for the Nigerian startup ecosystem, there are likely to be more investments from local actors.
